ESU Coordinating Council
February 04, 2015 1:00 PM
Finance, Audit, and Budget Committee Meeting
1. Call to Order
Rationale

Notice to visitors:  To be heard at this meeting, the "Request to be Heard" form, must be completed and submitted to the Secretary to the Executive Director of ESUCC.  The President of the Board of ESUCC will call upon visitors wishing to address the Board in the order they were submitted or by subject.

Pursuant to Section 84-1411 of the Nebraska Statutes, notice of this meeting was given by advertisement on the ESUCC website, NE Public Meeting site, and host site.

Open Meetings Law
: Pursuant to Section 84 - 1412 of the Nebraska Statutes, the public is hereby informed that a current copy of the Nebraska Open Meetings Act is posted in this meeting room. 

2. Roll Call
3. Agenda Item
Chair of Committee
3.A. Approve Claims, Financials Statements, and Assets for Month of December
Chair of Committee
Rationale

 

Attachments
Recommended Motion

Recommend approval of Approve Claims, Financials Statements, and Assets for Month of December

3.B. Approval of February Expenses
Committee Chair - Dennis Radford
Attachments
Recommended Motion

Recommend motion to approve January expenses

3.C. LMS Revenue
Chair of Committee, Dennis Radford
Rationale

Total purchase price of 26,000 ANGEL/BlackBoard licenses = $96,460.00
Total revenue generated from ANGEL BlackBoard licenses = $199,355.00

3.D. Medicaid
Chair of Committee, Dennis Radford
Rationale

Earlier this year Dennis Pool and I discussed Medicaid in regard to a statewide service and statewide funding.  Based upon this conversation, this has been listed as one of ten ESUCC Budget Goals.

Prior to the Christmas break, Steve Milliken and I began discussing Medicaid in regard to statewide services and increased funding for school districts, ESU's and ESUCC.  What this would or will be is unknown at this time as dialogue with the DHHS is essential.  A meeting was scheduled January 14, 2015 with Brian Halstead, Steve Milliken and I to discuss this possibility.  Steve and I will attend a meeting with the DHHS January 26, 2015 with the intention of being at the table for a possible partnership.

As per Brian Halstead, statute provides for a partnership between the DHHS and NDE.  With that said, our involvement could be structured as a contracted service provider through NDE; whereby, revision in state statute may not be required.  Again, this is all preliminary but worth pursing. 

NASB is involved in the MAPS portion of Medicaid; whereby, the partnership in question is specific to the MIPS portion of Medicaid.  Steve Milliken did indicate that our funding through this project as it stands now is around $3,000,000 per year which was similar to the state of Virginia.  After implementation of their statewide effort through coordination and increased staff, the total revenue for the state of Virginia increased from $3,000,000 to roughly $17,000,000 per year.  Again, Steve and I will need to have continued conversations with needed stakeholders to determine the possible direction for this project.

3.E. Fiscal Management Goals (Departmental Carry Over)
3.E.I. Coop
Rationale

Coop Goals:

ESUCC will appprove a balanced budget beginning the 2018-19 year.  (3 years:  $149,485 deficit)

Evaluate the effectiveness of ESM and provide recommendation(s) for continuation of ESM or recommendation(s) of a different software provider by May 2015.  

Review, recommend and implement expanded opportunities for the Coop Purchasing Project.  


LMS Goals:

ESUCC will approve a balanced budget beginning the 2017-18 year.  (2 years:  $69,274 deficit)

Evaluate the effectiveness of the current LMS and provide a recommendatoin for continuation of or recommendation for a new LMS by March 2015.

Review and/or revise the costs for the LMS as reflected in the Master Services Agreement.


SRS Goals:

ESUCC will approve a balanced budget beginning the 2015-16 year.  ($42,012 deficit)

Continue the process of employing a System's Analysts within ESUCC.  

Review and/or revise the costs for SRS as reflected in the Master Services Agreement.


IMAT Goals:

ESUCC will approve a balanced budget beginning the 2015-16 year.  ($30,611 deficit)

Review and/or revise the costs for SRS as reflected in the Master Services Agreement.

3.E.II. SRS
Rationale

Coop Goals:

ESUCC will appprove a balanced budget beginning the 2018-19 year.  (3 years:  $149,485 deficit) 

Evaluate the effectiveness of ESM and provide recommendation(s) for continuation of ESM or recommendation(s) of a different software provider by May 2015.  

Review, recommend and implement expanded opportunities for the Coop Purchasing Project.  


LMS Goals:

ESUCC will approve a balanced budget beginning the 2017-18 year.  (2 years:  $69,274 deficit)

Evaluate the effectiveness of the current LMS and provide a recommendatoin for continuation of or recommendation for a new LMS by March 2015.

Review and/or revise the costs for the LMS as reflected in the Master Services Agreement.


SRS Goals:

ESUCC will approve a balanced budget beginning the 2015-16 year.  ($42,012 deficit)

Continue the process of employing a System's Analysts within ESUCC.  

Review and/or revise the costs for SRS as reflected in the Master Services Agreement.


IMAT Goals:

ESUCC will approve a balanced budget beginning the 2015-16 year.  ($30,611 deficit)

Review and/or revise the costs for SRS as reflected in the Master Services Agreement.

3.E.III. IMAT
Rationale

Coop Goals:

ESUCC will appprove a balanced budget beginning the 2018-19 year.  (3 years:  $149,485 deficit) 

Evaluate the effectiveness of ESM and provide recommendation(s) for continuation of ESM or recommendation(s) of a different software provider by May 2015.  

Review, recommend and implement expanded opportunities for the Coop Purchasing Project.  


LMS Goals:

ESUCC will approve a balanced budget beginning the 2017-18 year.  (2 years:  $69,274 deficit)

Evaluate the effectiveness of the current LMS and provide a recommendatoin for continuation of or recommendation for a new LMS by March 2015.

Review and/or revise the costs for the LMS as reflected in the Master Services Agreement.


SRS Goals:

ESUCC will approve a balanced budget beginning the 2015-16 year.  ($42,012 deficit)

Continue the process of employing a System's Analysts within ESUCC.  

Review and/or revise the costs for SRS as reflected in the Master Services Agreement.


IMAT Goals:

ESUCC will approve a balanced budget beginning the 2015-16 year.  ($30,611 deficit)

Review and/or revise the costs for SRS as reflected in the Master Services Agreement.

3.E.IV. LMS
Rationale

Coop Goals:

ESUCC will appprove a balanced budget beginning the 2018-19 year.  (3 years:  $149,485 deficit) 

Evaluate the effectiveness of ESM and provide recommendation(s) for continuation of ESM or recommendation(s) of a different software provider by May 2015.  

Review, recommend and implement expanded opportunities for the Coop Purchasing Project.  


LMS Goals:

ESUCC will approve a balanced budget beginning the 2017-18 year.  (2 years:  $69,274 deficit)

Evaluate the effectiveness of the current LMS and provide a recommendatoin for continuation of or recommendation for a new LMS by March 2015.

Review and/or revise the costs for the LMS as reflected in the Master Services Agreement.


SRS Goals:

ESUCC will approve a balanced budget beginning the 2015-16 year.  ($42,012 deficit)

Continue the process of employing a System's Analysts within ESUCC.  

Review and/or revise the costs for SRS as reflected in the Master Services Agreement.


IMAT Goals:

ESUCC will approve a balanced budget beginning the 2015-16 year.  ($30,611 deficit)

Review and/or revise the costs for SRS as reflected in the Master Services Agreement.

3.F. Master Service Agreement
Chair of Committee, Dennis Radford
Attachments
4. Next Meeting Agenda Items
5. Executive Session
Rationale

The ESU Coordinating Council is authorized by state statute to enter into executive session. Executive session may be held when clearly necessary for the protection of the public interest or for the prevention of needless injury to the reputation of an individual. Reasons that meet this standard include but are not limited to: (a) strategy sessions with respect to collective bargaining, real estate matters, pending litigation, or litigation which is imminent as evidenced by communication of a claim or threat of litigation to or by the public body; (b) discussion regarding deployment of security personnel or devices; (c) investigative proceedings regarding allegations of criminal misconduct; (d) evaluation of the job performance of a person when necessary to prevent needless injury to the reputation of a person and if such person has not requested a public meeting; and (e) legal advice.

Explanation

At this point, it is appropriate for the Board to meet in closed session for one of the stated matters and/or any other permissible closed session matters in compliance with the law.

PROPOSAL:

That the Board hold a closed session:

1. For strategy session with respect to negotiations/collective bargaining clearly necessary for the protection of the public interest or for the prevention of needless injury to the reputation of an individual in compliance with the law.

2. For strategy session with respect to property/real estate matters clearly necessary for the protection of the public interest or for the prevention of needless injury to the reputation of an individual in compliance with the law.

3. For strategy session with respect to pending litigation, or litigation which is imminent as evidenced by communication of a claim or threat of litigation to or by the public body clearly necessary for the protection of the public interest or for the prevention of needless injury to the reputation of an individual in compliance with the law.

4. For discussion regarding deployment of security personnel or devices clearly necessary for the protection of the public interest or for the prevention of needless injury to the reputation of an individual in compliance with the law.

5. For investigative proceedings regarding allegations of criminal misconduct clearly necessary for the protection of the public interest or for the prevention of needless injury to the reputation of an individual in compliance with the law.

6. For personnel and the evaluation of job performance clearly necessary for the protection of the public interest or for the prevention of needless injury to the reputation of an individual in compliance with the law.

7. For discussions of the legal consequences of specific action and legal advice clearly necessary for the protection of the public interest or for the prevention of needless injury to the reputation of an individual in compliance with the law.

6. Adjournment